The world's first agentic Allied Defence Training platform — reducing the complete DSAT lifecycle by ~90% and cutting programme costs by up to ~80%. 100% compliant with JSP 822 V8.0, DSAT, NATO Bi-SC 075-003, TRADOC 350-70, ASD/AIA S6000T, and JSP 822 V7 Vol 6 (Technology Enhanced Learning). SCORM 1.2 · xAPI · DLE · TAFMIS — built in.
NOVA™ sits at the intersection of Allied Defence doctrine, learning science, and AI — delivering the analytical power of a full instructional design team at the speed modern defence demands.
NOVA™ is an AI platform precision engineered primarily for Allied Defence Training. It ingests doctrine, requirements, and operational context and then autonomously generates training system documentation, learning architectures, and performance diagnostics compliant with UK DSAT (JSP 822 V8.0 & DTSMs), NATO Bi-SC 075-003, US TRADOC 350-70, and ASD/AIA S6000T.
NOVA is built on the principles of Systems Approach to Training (SAT) and uses a framework that operates across four elements as defined in JSP 822 V8.0: Analysis (Element 1) · Design (Element 2) · Delivery (Element 3) · Evaluation (Element 4). Governance, Management and Assurance — the Management of Training System (MTS) — runs across all four elements, as mandated by JSP 822 V8.0.
NOVA covers both dimensions of the DSAT framework: Individual Training per JSP 822 V8.0 Ch.3 and JSP 822 V8.0, and Collective Training per JSP 822 V8.0 Ch.2 and NATO Bi-SC 075-003.
A Learning Management System delivers content. NOVA™ designs, governs, and continuously improves the training system that creates that content. It is the architecture behind the architecture.
Where an LMS measures whether learners completed a course, NOVA measures whether the course was worth completing — and generates a revised design if not. Where a compliance tool checks a document against a checklist, NOVA generates the document already compliant, with every JSP 822 V8.0 & DTSMs Must and Should requirement embedded from the first draft.
Traditional training design tools are like manual drafting tables — precise, slow, dependent on individual expertise, and unable to integrate new information without starting again. NOVA™ is the CAD system: it retains all institutional knowledge, applies all relevant standards automatically, and enables iteration at speed without sacrificing rigour.
More precisely: if a conventional training design team is a battalion advancing on foot, NOVA gives it air mobility, real-time ISR, and a common operating picture. The mission remains. The execution is fundamentally transformed.
The Strategic Defence Review 2025 demands a training system that is flexible, adaptive, and integrated by design. JSP 822 V8.0 & DTSMs was rewritten in direct response. The current infrastructure cannot deliver this — and the gap between what is required and what exists is measurable.
Training designers spend 60–70% of their time on formatting, compliance checking, and cross-referencing rather than on actual learning design — the core instructional work they were hired to do.
Must and Should requirements unevenly applied across establishments, creating audit risk, quality variance, and costly rework at the point of Training Authorisation and CEB review.
Programme-by-programme design contrary to JSP 822 V8.0 Ch.2. No enterprise-level METL alignment. No cross-programme integration. No shared learning. The Integrated Force cannot be trained in silos.
Level 3 and 4 evaluation — transfer to operational environment, organisational readiness impact — is practically absent from most programmes despite being embedded in DTSM 5 (Evaluation) and JSP 822 V8.0 Ch.3 QMS requirements.
Institutional knowledge resides with individuals. When personnel rotate, the programme memory goes with them. There is no persistent organisational training record that the DSAT QMS requires.
Training spend cannot be quantified against operational readiness outcomes because the data infrastructure does not exist. CEB governance cannot be evidence-based without evidence.
NOVA™ transforms Individual Training through the full JSP 822 V8.0 lifecycle — and Collective Training through JSP 822 V8.0 Ch.2 and NATO Bi-SC 075-003. Both dimensions. One governed, auditable system with full TEL integration — SCORM, DLE, TAFMIS, and NATO ADL by default.
The full TNA per DTSM 2 (Analysis) — Scoping Exercise, Risk and Assumptions Register, Role Analysis, Training Gap Analysis, Training Options Analysis, Training Needs Report — generated autonomously with embedded JSP 822 citations and full audit trail.
Training Objectives (Performance, Conditions, Standards per DTSM 3 (Design)), Learning Specifications, FTS, Assessment Strategy, and Assessment Specification produced as a connected, cross-referenced document set. Branch conditions, mastery thresholds, and SCORM 1.2-compatible output packages generated automatically.
The Training Authorisation Document — the signed contract between TRA, TDA, and Training Provider mandated by JSP 822 V8.0 Ch.3 — is built incrementally from day one and maintained throughout the programme lifecycle. CEB governance cycles, Working Group templates, and decision records are all embedded.
InVal, ExVal, TNE, and Evaluation Strategy generated and managed per DTSM 5 (Evaluation). Assessment data aggregated to produce competency gap analyses and predictive readiness indices. Level 3 and 4 evaluation operationalised — not aspirational.
Mission Essential Task Lists, Collective Training Plans, and Exercise Design Documents generated in alignment with JSP 822 V8.0 Ch.2 and NATO Bi-SC 075-003. Shared competency frameworks ensure coherence between individual DSAT outputs and collective task performance requirements at unit, formation, and enterprise level.
NOVA supports all stages of the NATO EP — Stage 0 (Initiation) through Stage 4 (Post-Exercise). Exercise Initiation documents (EXINT), Exercise Specifications (EXSPEC), Exercise Control documentation, and Observer-Controller briefs generated per the unified NATO EP methodology in use from 2025.
After-action review data structured, categorised, and routed directly into training design revision queues. The feedback loop mandated by JSP 822 V8.0 QMS and NATO CT&E policy is embedded by design — not dependent on individual analyst effort.
Institutional training record at enterprise level: programme maturity, compliance status, training throughput, collective competency trends. Provides the evidence base for CEB governance, IITEB reporting, and MSHQ oversight — all governed per JSP 822 V8.0 Ch.3 MTS requirements.
Define the training need. Scope the requirement. Establish the evidence base.
Generate learning architectures. Produce the full doctrinal document set.
Authorise, programme, and deliver training. Govern with CEB. Export to LMS.
Validate, evaluate, and assure. Feed findings back into the cycle.
NOVA™ operationalises the full Training Needs Analysis process aligned to JSP 822 V8.0. Starting from the Statement of Requirement, NOVA generates every mandated analysis output — Scoping Exercise, Risk and Assumptions Register, Scoping Exercise Report, Role Analysis, Role Performance Statement, Training Gap Analysis, Initial Training Objectives, Training Options Analysis, Training Needs Report, and Training Needs Evaluation — with a complete, doctrinal audit trail.
From the Analysis outputs, NOVA™ generates the complete training design document set — aligned to JSP 822 V8.0. Training Objectives (Performance, Conditions, Standards) are derived from the Role Performance Statement. Learning Specifications, Formal Training Specifications, Assessment Strategies, Assessment Specifications, and Lesson Plans are produced as a connected, cross-referenced set.
NOVA™ manages the full delivery governance cycle. The Training Authorisation Document — the signed contract between TRA, TDA, and Training Provider mandated by JSP 822 V8.0 — is built incrementally from day one. Customer Executive Board governance cycles, scheduling, resourcing plans, and delivery documentation are all embedded and maintained throughout the programme lifecycle.
NOVA™ closes the DSAT loop. Evaluation Strategy, Internal Validation (InVal), External Validation (ExVal), and Training Needs Evaluation are generated and managed per JSP 822 V8.0. Kirkpatrick Levels 1–4 are operationalised — not theoretical. Evaluation data feeds continuously back into Analysis, creating the self-improving training system JSP 822 V8.0 mandates.
NOVA™ is built natively on four JSP 822 frameworks. Every output — every document, every architecture, every evaluation instrument — is generated within the governance structure of these frameworks simultaneously.
UK Defence Systems Approach to Training
The primary doctrinal authority for all Individual and Collective Training in UK Defence. JSP 822 V8.0 defines policy for the full DSAT lifecycle — Analysis, Design, Delivery, and Evaluation — and the eight Defence Training Support Manuals (DTSMs) provide the practitioner-level guidance for each element. NOVA is built from this framework as its doctrinal bedrock, not retrofitted to it.
Training and Doctrine Command — TRADOC 350-70
US Army Training and Doctrine Command Regulation 350-70 provides the Systems Approach to Training framework for the US military. NOVA's alignment to TRADOC 350-70 enables Allied interoperability — outputs generated for UK programmes can be cross-referenced against TRADOC standards, and US-originated training requirements can be processed natively within the platform.
Bi-Strategic Command CT&E Directive 075-003
NATO Bi-SC Collective Training and Exercise Directive 075-003 governs the planning, execution, and evaluation of all NATO Collective Training and Exercises. JSP 822 V8.0 Ch.2 mandates UK compliance with this directive. NOVA supports the full NATO Exercise Process — Stage 0 through Stage 4 — and generates all exercise documentation aligned to NATO standards in use from 2025.
Training Systems Engineering Standard
ASD/AIA S6000T is the international standard for integrated training systems in defence acquisition programmes — the training systems engineering framework used across European and Allied defence primes. NOVA's alignment to S6000T enables compliance for complex acquisition programmes where training system design must integrate with the broader defence acquisition lifecycle.
TEL Ruleset · DLE · TAFMIS · SCORM 1.2 · xAPI · STANAG 2591
JSP 822 V7.0 Volume 6 governs all Technology Enhanced Learning across UK Defence — from SCORM package generation to DLE registration, TAFMIS integration, and NATO content sharing under STANAG 2591. NOVA integrates all 12 principles of the TEL Ruleset into every SCORM output, applying open standards (IEEE P1484, xAPI P9274), WCAG 2.1 accessibility, DTEL Taxonomy tagging, and DLE naming conventions automatically. All generated learning packages are DLE-ready and NATO-shareable by default.
You have the domain expertise. What you don't have is time. Seventy per cent of your week disappears into compliance formatting, cross-referencing against JSP 822 V8.0 and doctrinal standards, and template management — rather than the learning design work you were hired to do. NOVA™ gives that time back.
You're managing a portfolio of programmes simultaneously. You need real-time visibility of doctrinal compliance status, training throughput, and competency gaps across all of them. The evidence base for CEB governance and IITEB reporting cannot be assembled from spreadsheets at month-end.
You need to know if your unit is trained and ready. Not anecdotally — evidentially. NOVA™'s readiness indices give you a defensible, data-based picture of where your people stand against METL standards, in time to act before operational commitments demand it.
Your contract requires JSP 822 V8.0-compliant documentation delivery. Your project margins are under pressure. Every week of documentation rework is a week of cost you weren't paid for. NOVA™ eliminates the rework, reduces the cost of compliance, and accelerates delivery against contract milestones.
You run a portfolio of regulated courses, each with its own Training Authorisation Document, CEB review cycle, and DTSM 5 (Evaluation) evaluation requirement. NOVA™ manages the TrAD lifecycle, flags courses approaching their mandated review date, and synthesises evaluation data across your entire catalogue — permanently inspection-ready.
What used to take my team two weeks to produce — TNA, Scoping Exercise, FTS, Learning Spec — NOVA™ generates in a morning. The compliance is automatic. The doctrinal audit trail is built as you go. I haven't had a TrAD submission returned for rework since we deployed it.
For the first time, I have real-time visibility of doctrinal compliance status across every programme in my portfolio in a single view. That's not a marginal improvement — it's the evidence base for CEB governance that I've never had before.
Our TrAD submissions used to be the most stressful part of the programme cycle. With NOVA™, the TrAD is built incrementally from the first day of analysis. By the time we go to CEB, it has already been validated three times. Inspection is just confirming what we already know.
NOVA™ is not a future capability. The platform exists. The frameworks are operational. The doctrine alignment is verified against JSP 822 V8.0 & DTSMs, DTSM 8 (ADL), and NATO Bi-SC 075-003. The only remaining decision is yours.
novaalliedtrainingllm.com · nova-agent.pages.dev · RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL — IN CONFIDENCE · JSP 822 V7 Vol 6 TEL Integrated